Three honest paths for an obsolete PLC platform — and how to choose without overspending or stopping production.
| Symptom | Likely cause | Action |
|---|---|---|
| CPU fails, program has no backup | Total loss risk | Source tested CPU, upload program first |
| Same rack fails repeatedly | Systematic aging (power supply, backplane) | Replace rack, keep I/O where possible |
| OEM no longer supports platform | Spare risk on next failure | Standing sourcing agreement as bridge |
| Expansion needed on full rack | Platform capacity limit | Plan migration window, source spares meanwhile |
| Insurance or audit flags platform | Compliance pressure | Documented migration to current platform |
We support all three paths. For repair and sourcing, see our platform pages: Siemens S5, Allen-Bradley PLC-5, SLC 500, Omron C200H, Mitsubishi A series, GE Fanuc 90-30 and Modicon 984/TSX. Send your rack photos for a free compatibility check and a quote within 12 hours.
Upload it before anything fails. If the CPU still runs, a technician can extract the program via the legacy programming hardware — we can arrange this before you commit to a path.
Not always. If the machine has 5+ years of life left, a tested surplus CPU plus a bridge sourcing agreement is often cheaper than migration. Migration wins when failures become frequent or the platform blocks production changes.
Typically 2-6 weeks for engineering and panel build, with the actual cut-over in a planned outage window. Sourced spares keep the line running during the whole process.
Yes — for plants with a known legacy equipment list we set up standing sourcing agreements with agreed response times and pricing bands.